Customer Reviews
Doors of Perception - By: Clary Antome, 23 Jan 2007 
If :
- Your mum has taught you lots of valuable things (eat your vegetables, be nice to old people & little dogs, don't be late to school, keep a clean nose) but she was never really able to explain why you had to WORK for a living - instead of, you know, just living;
- Your teachers packed your head full with all kinds of useful knowledge (about prepositions & adverbs, mineralogy & astrophysics, the reproductive organs of plants, x+2-y=0) but they never told you how exactly PROFITS are made - & why anybody would want to make them anyway;
- Your friends & lovers can spend hours yakking about various interesting topics (the latest music machine, videogames, designer shoes, imitation leather sofas, blockbuster movies, pink underwear & cherry flavoured bubble-gum) but they call you a bore & a nitpick whenever you wonder why you're all surrounded by so many COMMODITIES & publicity ads promising you bigger, better & faster useless things.
- You often have the impression that some greater truth is lackingin your life (and you've tried all the legal/illegal drugs, exciting TV shows, gurus & psychoanalysts, help-yourself books & bestsellers about kid sorcerers)...
...Then the time may have come to have a long talk with good old Uncle Karl - the black sheep of the social sciences, the guy nobody likes to mention at social occasions (exceptin the form of a joke: "have you heard the one about Karl Marxin Las Vegas?"), the most misquoted & misinterpreted modern thinker.
In "Capital", he kindly invites you to break on through to the other side (that's how countercultural he was) & check out what's really happening behind the glitzy appearances of everyday life. You don't even have to be a genius to understand him (it will be enough if you can count to ten without choking). And you might be surprised about how obvious some things will seem after he explains to you about the cage you're sitting in.
Of course, mum will probably be broken-hearted & fear that you'll join the next anarcho-pinko-terrorist organization down the block. Your teachers might refer to a vast list of successful anti-Marx books & charity organizations. And your friends & lovers will find you an even greater bore than before.
Surplus value - By: Lew E. Jeppson, 17 Nov 2006 The most important issuein economics today is an evaluation of Marx's theory of surplus value. If corporations were getting smaller, if labor's lot overall was improving, if peace was breaking out all over, we might well conclude Marx was wrong. Marx must be dealt with. It is incredible that most economics PhD's have never read Capital.
why you should read marx - By: , 12 Jan 2000 In Marx' economic works & above allin "capital" we find the deepening of the classical economists' theory of value, an understanding of the origins of crises as the text develops throughout 3 volumes, a superior methodin the way of treating economic problems, & an historical background to the theory generally. All the criticisms of Marx are well-known by now & have been effectively discussed by other marxist writers such as David Harveyin "The Limits to Capital" & Guglielmo Carchediin "New Frontiersin Political Economy". If one looks throughout history violence is almost always committed when poltical/economic systems change. To blame Marx for a 100 million deaths is complete idiocy as one could likewise blame Nietzsche for WW2 or George Washington for the death of all the original inhabitants of the US plus all the deaths attributable to US meddling around the world. As someone with substantial knowledge of world history Marx was aware of the necessity of violence when society was split between irreconcilable forces & didn't shrink from pointing this out. Those who still advocate neo-liberalism & free markets are thosein power who have benefited from their pre-existing superior strength & have little concern for the deteriorating environment & the awful labour conditionsin most of the world. Marx is still relevantin these times (the neo-liberals still invoke Adam Smith, an 18 century political economist), so if all we have to look forward to is the "mutual ruination of the contending classes" I'll see you all on the barricades!
The Influence Of Good on Evil - By: , 07 Jan 2000 Criticisms of Marx arise mainly from reading this volume of "Capital", yet it is his whole body of thought that needs to be considered when assessing such a thinker, especially before one makes bold, unqualified statements. In that "Capital" is probably the most important & relevant economic text now, a century after he completed it, does it solely deserve to be read. Fellow reviewers have brought to attention the violence this book has caused - this has arisen from ignoring the whole body of Marx' work. I would recommend this, therefore, to only students of Marxian thought or economics - where, of course, its influence lies. It is certainly true that the historical part of the text is a little dry - but this is only to be expected of Marx's materialist approach. A work of genius from a genius, then, but for anyone wishing to see the main thrust of Marx's body of thought is better off starting with part one of "The German Ideology" or the weightier "Grundrisse", where he states his conditions for revolutionary violence - conditions which still haven't been reached today.
Overreach of a genius - By: , 21 Nov 1998 
Marx was an extraordinary analyst of economics. He was a serviceable philosopher, but the problem is that he tried to play prophet. Capital is worth reading for its insight into the workings of early, unrestrained capitalism & its recognition of the importance of the trade cycle. On the other hand, the prophecies that Marx made were farreaching & illogical. It is onlyin the ambitiousness of his project that Marx fails to reach the heights of a Hume or a Smith. Personally, I could not agree less with the tenets of violence & collectivism laid down by Marx, but even I cannot ignore the huge contribution that Marx has made to today's world.
