Customer Reviews
Avoid The Void - By: John Rudkin, 07 Dec 2008 
Avoid The Void
This book is a disappointment. Some of it is written for the intelligent layperson, but elsewhere significant prior knowledge is assumed (e.g. unheralded mentions of "proton", "neutron," the mysterious spectrum of hydrogen", "Mendeleev's table", "Gev"). Close makes the amazing assertion that "the electron is a basic particle of all matter", & his statement that a field is "a collection of numbers that vary from point to point" is a classic confusion of map & territory. Convoluted style, prejudice & apparent ignorance of evidence is demonstrated by the claim that quantum mechanics creates "mind-bending paradoxes that some charlatans exploit to convince the public that scientists seriously consider parallel universes ...or that telepathic communication is possible". "Zero degrees Kelvin" is a surprising solecism from a Kelvin medal winner. The expression "begs the question" is used frequently & incorrectly. A good editor could have helped.
A fairly limited take on emptiness - By: Christian Jongeneel, 02 Nov 2008 
A book on emptiness that starts & ends with quotes of the Rig Veda, the oldest of the sacred hindu books, raises expectations. Unfortunately, not all of these are met.
Frank Close does a very fine job of visualising the void for his readers, for instance by explaining how the dot of ink at the end of a sentence should be blown op to 100 metres to make visible the individual atoms with the naked eye, but to 10.000 kilometres to see the atom's nucleous. There is so much emptiness even within the atom.
The best chapter is the one about ether, the substance the old Greeks dreamed up to avoid the void, which appeared to be very difficult to get rid ofin scientific theory, even if there was no supporting evidence for its existence. No complaints, then, about mr. Close's ability to deal with complex physics, although especially some paragraphs on particle physics are pretty tough.
The disappointment liesin the summary hints to philosophical views on the void. This is not a bad book, but it could have been a lot better had mr. Close taken a broader view on his subject, as he appears to set out toin his own introduction & the back cover praise.
This Void is about average - By: David Lea, 13 Apr 2008 The book starts well with the physics explained at a fairly basic & historical level. Subsequent chapters advance this view with explanations of the theory of relativity & quantum mechanics along the way. The final two chapters however are the meat of the book & feel hurried with topics suddenly appearing that lack adequate explanation or background information. Did the book succeed ? In my view, not quite. It is a relatively short book, interesting but lacking a lot of explanation of the more complex later science that could have made it really good. Shame!
Reading about Nothing is actually really interesting - By: Duncan Geoghegan, 26 Nov 2007 
Professor Frank Close has managed to engage the non-physicist readerin a topic normally reserved for the intellectual elite. He offers a detailed yet broad analysis of The Void, of nothingness, a topic you would be forgiven for thinking is 'a done deal'.
But far from it, vacuums & the concept of nothingness have been on the minds of many great thinkers throughout time, from the early Greeks to the modern-day super brains at international research centres such as CERNin Switzerland. In a bid to understand our own existence, we may contemplate our opposite: non-existence. The book is not ignorant of the large philosophical questions either.
As the concept of vacuums evolved throughout history Close is there explainingin a real, down-to-earth voice what exactly is going on. The book is illustrated with diagrams throughout, & if like me, you have trouble visualising some of the more difficult concepts, these comein very handy. Having said that, I imagine even an A-Star physics student stands to benefit from this book.
The book is split into nine chapters, with each chapter being further divided logically according to topic. The book enters into the science of atoms, light, the quantum, waves & particles amidst other areas to explain the nature of a vacuum. The Big Bang, Aether, higher dimensions & time are also discussed. Warning: there are very large & small numbers featuredin this book, & some concepts will challenge your understanding of your three-dimensional reality.
If you have ever wondered about what is left when you take all the stars, planets & us out of the universe, or that split second after the big bang, then this book hits the money. I recommend this book on the grounds that it covers an interesting topic, whilst introducing other facets of physics, is readable even to the untrained brain & makes you think twice & go 'aha'.
In short: there's Nothing I don't like about it.
