Customer Reviews
Challenging, riveting, subversive, creative, wonderful - By: Simon Cross, 04 Jun 2008 
This is one of the best, most challenging & thought provoking books around at the moment. Despite it's American target audience (we don't have a president here - yet) it makes great reading for any reader, as its themes are universal.
This is unlikely to look like any book you have ever read before, it's got nearly as muchin common with a graphic novel as it has with a standard text book. The best comparison I can give, & it is quite inappropriate really given the anti consumerist approach of the authors, is with a Howies clothing catalogue. It has that same earthy, lived in, thoughtful, artistic & engaging feel, but thankfully without the pictures of models wearing expensive clothes.
Put simply, this has got to be one of the most beautifully designed books on the market - working with the writing, the design emphasises the creative, radical spirit of the text, & the provocative joy of the authors. Quite rightly the designers are credited at the end of the book along with the writers. The colour is full throughout the book, with design elements interacting with the text throughout, which adds immensely to the value of the content. If you liked the look of `Irresistible Revolution' then this is a quantum leap forward, like as if the publishers suddenly realised what this thing was all about...
In some ways it reminds me of an illuminated manuscript, from backin the day of monkishness, when religious texts were coloured & illustrated by devoted scholars. This fits with the fact that the authors are part of the new monastic movement - & perhaps this could be seen as the contemporary equivalent.
But aside from a fantastic design job - what does the latest offering from our dreadlocked brother actually contain? Well first point to make, there are very clearly two voices audiblein this book. Claiborne & Haw have coinciding views, but different emphases, or perhaps just different experiences, which while bringing occasional difficulties to the academic niceties of the text, actually help lend weight to this book. Actually - if you count the design, then addin one or two more voices as well.
Written throughout in easily digestible chunks, the book begins as a dissection of a theme of radical God politics which the authors show running through the bible. It sidetracks through stories of friends, writings of early Christians & reflections on current affairs.
It's a book of stories, parables, & prophecy, it is not supposed to be a tome, or a text book, or a prize winning essay - this is a work of love, an object of discussion, a catalyst (for want of a less clichéd term) for renewed engagement with the themes, & an encouragement to live a different way.
Rather than taking an easy option, such as a single standpoint of Christian anarchy for example, or an anti war vote, Claiborne & Haw manage to turn the whole idea around, arguing for a radical Christian engagement with politics & societyin a way that is at once submissive & subversive.
American voters wanting to know who the writers say they should vote for, will find themselves left with the same choices, but hopefully looking at them through new, or perhaps ancient lenses. I suspect also that this will help many bring a new creativity to their decision making.
Pacifism & anti (or non) consumerism are key themes, but they each form only part of the overall principal argument, which is to see God's people as a people set apart by God, called to live another way, & to follow only one leader. It critiques the philosophy that one can serve God, & walkin the way of the world.
This clarion call to a subversive & renewed people of God is a creative & stimulating read - it's not without its problems, one cant help thinking that if Claiborne authors another book, he will have come close to being part of the system which he so clearly wants to work against, but at the same time, I like many others would be happy to read anything he writes. One might also question how the authors can happily work with others such as Jim Wallis who argue for a more conventional approach to politics... clearly McLaren is not the only one with a generous orthodoxy these days.
Some readers may find biblical references to apocryphal books troubling or confusing, I don't,in fact I like it. Some factual discrepancies may exist within the text, (numbers of deadin Iraq, or etc) but these are minor when looked atin context, & can be put down to the issue of dual authorship.
It's a beautiful, peaceful, challenging, affirming, prophetic, subversive & creative book, well worth reading, sharing, mulling over... likely to become a classic.