Customer Reviews
Not really that bad.. - By: Sarah Lakey, 05 Sep 2007 
Ok so this book is nowhere near as good as the first. The writing seems a different style, the imagination has been lost a little bit, & you being to lose empathy with the character. However despite all of this i really do not think the book is that bad! It did keep me reading & I did want to know what happenedin the end. If you were to read this book having never read the first one you would probably be quite happy. It is still worth reading as a sequel though. Give it a try.
Disappointing. - By: , 07 Aug 1999 
After searching for this book for so long, I finally found it - unfortunately. I guess there was nothing left to do after the Story Of O. Absolutely nothing happensin this book. The writing style doesn't even seem the same. You are much better off getting The Passive Voice by G.C. Scott. That book is writtenin the style of the Story Of O only not quite as dark.
Lacking in sensuality compared to Story of O - By: , 06 Mar 1999 I was anticipating a continuation of the overwhelming sensuality foundin the Story of O. My hopes were not only thwarted, they were dashed. Return to the Chateau portrayed a dark heavy scenario... O's desertion by her Master, discarded & unwanted, forced into a life little better than that of a common prostitute. It is incomprehensible to me that the two books were written by the same author. Obviously when this was written, the author was sadly disillusioned by the Lifestyle she once so warmly & passionately embraced.
Still exciting but somewhat disappointing - By: , 07 Nov 1998 This book was great, but did not compare to Story of O. I was disappointed. I still recommend this if you are curious about O.
