Customer Reviews
A great work spoiled by "Wilder Publications" poor-quality publishing - By: Mr. John R. Bradford, 09 Jun 2008 
My two-star rating for this book refers not to the great quality of the work, but to the poor quality printing of this 2008 hard-cover "First Edition" by "Wilder Publications".
I have little to add to previous comments & recommendations for Chesterton's "The Everlasting Man", though I would add, as an aside, that you don't have to be a Roman Catholic, or an Orthodox Christianin order to appreciate its arguments. The common-sense writing is witty & mostly good-humoured, though some youngsters might find the style a little archaic. (C S Lewis,in "Surprised by Joy", describes GKC as a most sensible author, & I certainly agree).
But, looking for a hard-cover version, I bought a recent publication of this work from "Wilder Publications" & now wish I hadn't. I would advise others to avoid it; it has many typographical mistakes & astonishing truncations. For example, most of Chesterton's wonderful (and crucial) introduction has been left out; "h"s have been printed as "b"s where the spell-checker would not notice ("had" becomes "bad", for instance); chapter headings are missing from the tops of pages within the chapter (always annoying); lines of text are too long & awkwardly spaced; punctuation marks improperly placed;in my view, all symptoms of a rather poor standard of publishing.
It is inexcusable,in my opinion, for great works of literature to be marketedin such feeble condition. Whatever happened to proof-reading & quality control?
So I suggest you look elswhere than to "Wilder's" amateurish effort for your copy. Let's hope that the "Second Edition" (if "Wilder" should ever print one) will at least be correct & unabridged.
Superb, witty and most importantly True - By: , 11 Feb 2000 
I haven't got all that long, but I am 21 yrs old & a new convert to the Catholic Faith. Reading Chesterton, is the greatest motivation He addresses our yearning for Truth.Chesterton & Belloc are essential reading. This & Orthodoxy are writings of immense genius.
A Wonderful Roman Catholic View of History - By: , 01 May 1999 Chesterton is an old familiar name, & The Everlating Man, one of his better works. At first blush then there would appear to be no need, or at least a great need, to review this fine book. Yet, the Roman Catholic Church itself has fallen into error, & even heresy since Vatican II, & therefore 'The Everlasting Man' is a far greater book now than when it was published, because it presents the genuine viewpoint of Catholocism, not the 'feelgood' view so popular today. For those unfamiliar with the tumultuous controversy within the Catholic Church today, it must suffice that the Vatican quite literally abandoned the idea of objective truth as a doctrine, & replaced that doctrine with subjective truth. Everything is a point of view, we are told, because truth expands as man matures. Now, for Chesterton, a truth is a truth, & no comment on a truth, will stop a truth from remaining a truth. Therefore throughout the history of the Church, a doctrine, no matter how popular,no matter how well received, is always overthrown, when it is false. The magic of this book is reading of historical events with this point of viewin the background. The rise of Islam & its defeatin Europe, the Arian heresy etc. But the important point of the book today is this: Though the Vatican II Church appears impregnantable, it will fail, & if history is a guide, it will fail rather quickly. For any Catholic who wishes to understand the genuine Catholic viewpoint, & therefore understand through implication the mistakes of Vatican II, this is the book to buy.
One of C.S.Lewis's top ten books - By: , 18 Nov 1998 Lewis says: The case for Christianity is well given by Chestertonin The Everlasting Man.
You can read it on my Chesterton site.
Classic work on the nature of man and the Man called Christ - By: , 10 Aug 1998 Everlasting Man had a decisive rolein one of the most important conversions of the this century. C.S. Lewis described reading itin 1925 when he was still an atheist:
Then I read Chesterton's Everlasting Man & for the first time saw the whole Christian outline of history set outin a form that seemed to me to make sense . . . I already thought Chesterton the most sensible man alive "apart from his Christianity." Now, I veritably believe, I thought that Christianity itself was very sensible "apart from its Christianity." (Surprised by Joy p.223)
When asked what Christian writers had helped him, Lewis remarkedin 1963, six months before he died, "The contemporary book that has helped me the most is Chesterton's The Everlasting Man." (Godin the Dock p.260.)
The book has two parts. The first is titled "On the Creature called Man." It uses the available evidence from paleontology, an! cient history, comparative religions, etc. but brings it togetherin remarkable ways. The questions he asks (and to some extent, answers) are the ones we continue to brood over: How is man different from other animals? Why are there so many religions? How do we make some sense out of our long & tumultuous human history?
The questions raisedin the first part receive a more definitive answerin the second: "On the Man called Christ." It is not that Jesus gives a step by step response to each of the queries. Rather he begins by throwing us into an even more perplexing quandary. Chesterton asks what it would really be like to read the Gospel free of all preconceptions. The effect would not be "gentle Jesus, meek & mild," but rather someone who jars our sensibilities. As Chesterton points out, the most honest response might be "stark staring incredulity." Did he really do that? How could he say something so preposterous?
Chesterton's genius ! is to help us face the paradox, the seeming contradiction. ! Really there are only two possible responses to the riddle of the Gospel. Either Jesus is a blashemer (as Caiphas charged) or he is who he claimed to be--and the apostles professed him to be. In that claim Jesus is unique. Mohamet did not suggest equality with Allah. Moses was never placed on a par with Yahweh. Buddha, Zoroaster, Confucius never made assertions of divinity. Those who did were megolomaniacs like Caligula or the unfortunate people we confine to insane asylums. Yet few consider that Jesus was that kind of person. Chesterton, like C.S. Lewis after him, helps us confront the incredible implications of this greatest of all paradoxes.
He then asks the next logical question. Is the Church a continuation of Jesus or a breaking away from him? The first might seem hard to accept, but the second involves even greater difficulties. As a help to making the correct choice, Chesterton asks us to reflect on the analogy of a key. Its truth depends on whether it fits the lock! . You won't get very far analyzing its seemingly odd shape. What you have to is see if it opens the door.
In reflecting on the key (the creed) Chesterton uses what he calls "the witness of the heretics." (a.k.a. dissenters) Each one tried to reshape the key. The church has constantly resisted that. As Chesterton brilliantly illustrates, only if the key retains its shape will it unlock the door.
In the final chapter Chesterton gives one of the most remarkable arguments for the truth of faith: the "five deaths" of the Church. We are not the first ones to livein an age which has concluded the church was moribund, passé. But it has experienced some remarkable resurrections like a phoenix rising from its own ashes. Chesterton analyzes five times when that happened & offers his reflection on what that means for us today.
I say "today" because even tho Everlasting Man was written almost 75 years ago, it addresses many concerns which are stil! l current: evolution, feminism, historicism, cultural relati! vism, economic & social determinism, etc. It is salutary to see that backin the 20's these issues were already "old stuff." TV programs & magazine articles meant to be bold or shocking all of a sudden seem hackneyed.
In addition to its other merits, this book has the value of being immensely entertaining. Not that it is an easy read. In fact it requires a lot of concentration. Chesterton sometimes piles paradox upon paradoxin a way that one can feel dazzled & conclude he does not have substance behind his words. But that is a hasty conclusion. To read Chesterton requires a patience which is perhaps more difficultin our age. Yet to read him slowly & meditatively will bring great rewards.
