Customer Reviews
Good book with an incredible ending - By: I. Davis, 24 Oct 2008 
Like many of the other reviewers here I have read all of the Heresy books so far (interestingly I was also super disappointed with Descent of Angles, too). Unlike some of them, I am an avowed Abnett fan - the Eisenhorn booksin particular are excellent. Also unlike some here, I've always preferred WH40K books that weren't focussed on the Astartes.
All of that said, this is a fantastic book - it's not Chekhov but it moves along at a good clip & between the action & the intrigue it should keep you suitably gripped to the conclusion. That conclusion, by the way, is about the most gutsy I've ever seenin an established canon. I remain extremely surprised that Abnett was allowed to write it since,in certain interpretations, it pretty much turns the whole of conventional WH40K wisdom on its head & if you've got any history with the games or universe (I took it up as a kid at school, yonks ago) then it will probably mess with yours for a fair while after you put the book down.
Superb.
Outstanding - By: C. Bowles, 09 Sep 2008 Just finished this book, & am absolutely gobsmacked. Couldn't put it down.
I've read all the Horus Heresy so far, & have enjoyed all but Descent of Angels. Legion for me is the outstanding novel of them all, which is saying a lot. Gripping plot line- follows Fulgrimin that the style of the writing reflects somehow the character of the legionin question. The twisting plotline ties together beautifullyin one of the best endings I've ever readin a book.
Before the Horus Heresy was released, I'd always wondered about the motivations of the prime movers behind the civil war. Each Primarch that we've metin any detail has had their motivations for turning superbly examined. Legion makes no exception.
Don't let other reviewers who have complained that the book is mainly written from the viewpoint of an Imperial Guard unit put you off. You get a very interesting perspective as a result, & the book is definitely still about the Astartes. I personally don't think it could have been written any other way.
Can't recommend this enough.
A return to form - By: Jonesworth, 14 Jul 2008 Having counted myself within the endless ranks of readers somewhat disappointed with 'Descent of Angels', I naturally threw caution to the next Horus Heresy installment.
It's not that 'Descent...' was dull to read or poorly written, but Mitchel Scanlon's novel was the first Heresy novel that concerned itself primarily with non-astartes (or at least pre-astartes) individuals, a factor which would surely hinder a Horus Heresy novel. I was therefore sceptical about how effective a story that placed an Imperial Guard regiment at the forefront could be.
Fortunately, 'Legion' triumphs: characters are genuinely likeable (or detestable), the story is engrossing and, unlike Scanlon's novel, it doesn't hold back on Astartes fluff; Horus & the Heresy get at least more than a passing mention, which would surely seem compulsory for the series. Furthermore, although much of the story is told from the Geno Two-Five Chilliad perspective, The Alpha Legion also get their worth. Ultimately, you're not left feeling deprived reading this, something that the Dark Angels installment possibly suffered from.
Although he is included within the compilation of short stories scheduled for the seriesin April 2009, I sincerely hope that Abnett returns next year for another individual effort. Hugely entertaining.
The best in the series so far. - By: J. Mikkelsen, 16 Jun 2008 Except for Descent of Angels, all booksin the Heresy series have been great. Still, Legion tops them all. The Alpha Legion is by far the most interesting chapter featured so far (and im not usually for the Traitors...honestly!), & the literary quality of the writing is really astonishing. Where some of the other book have relied heavily on the fantastic W40K uninverse to see them through, Legion is an awesome book allin itself.
Skip Descent of Angels, which sucked, & go straight to Legion.
very weak for a Dan Abnett title - By: negativtoo, 08 Jun 2008 
I am not a great & avid fan of the Warhammer 40K franchise anymore, but I still enjoy the Horus Heresy cycle of Novels immensely. Much of this being due to the excellent novelsin it written by Dan Abnett, & partially because of the chance of gleaning an inside view of that particular cataclysmin the WH 40K universe.
Unfortunately, "Legion" falls far short of most other booksin the series, & especially most other ones written by the author. While his sketching (not development) of characters & their distinctive quirks is still top notch, & he creates a vivid (if limited) image of the world of Nurth, where almost the entire plot takes place this book suffers from a severy lack of "hard" information.
For one, the reader learns little if nothing at all about the titular "Alpha Legion" since none of the viewpoint-charcters & protagonist actually is an Alpha Legion Astartes. A legion which follows a unique doctrine of warfare through deception (of their opponents & especially their nominal allies ), misdirection & underhand planning.
To be honest, WTF is the author thinking ? I did not purchase the book to read about a more or less obscure Imperial Guard regiment, but one of the Great Legions, especially one, that was never previously really well described ! Instead I meet perhaps a handful of Astartes, the only noteworthy one(s) being the Primarch - who besides is as underwhelming & rough-cut as they come - & the novel tells almost Nothing at all, as to what the Alpha Legion actually does on Nurth. throughout the book, they give a pretty decent impression of flavourfully placed purple bystanders.
While the consequent outsider's view makes for a great but many times also frustrating impression of their mystiquein theory, most of the ploys used by them are entirely transparent (and one instinctively wonders how any entity with some braincells left would fall for those - unless forced to do so by plot-considerations ) , &in the end you are left with knowing barely anything about their way of thinking, their traditions, internal organisation - something that made "Horus Rising" by the same author so involving to read - or even allegiance. everything stays vague, undefined... hardly more than a doodle on the author's notepad.
Actually I would have wished for a lot more - reading intricate plots by watching over the shoulders of both sides involved is far more fun, & can be pulled off - actually something that the selfsame author has done repeatedly. This "you know nothing definite" shtick of "Legion" just smacks of laziness & disinterest, sorry to say.
Besides this deliberate vaguenes , the plot of the book moves as if on rails, many of the "management" level of commanders, high commanders & whatever acting with a massive degree of dumb ignorance, entirely unimaginative & with barely a shred of thoughtfulness. And only through this does the plot actually function.
In fact, it is more an absurd comedy of errors (although without the clowns & laughter ) , compounded by a total lack of reflection by the protagonists even months after the fact. And only because of this, does the plot actually "work"...... most communal councils have more common sense & shrewd ability to judge & question the motives of others. One should somehow think the same holds true of the - allegedly very capable - commanders of warhosts numbering close to a million. But for the sake of the tenuous plot, it just doesn't. And that is..... galling
Overall - while nicely craftedin some details, the whole book falls far short of the mark left by othersin the series, & as much as it pains me to claim the following, it should only be purchased vor completion's sake or as an avid, indiscriminating fan of the author. None of the characters actually stand out as notable or worth remembering beyond the limits of this story (unlike, say Captain Loken form "Horus Rising" ).
Luckily its cheap, so my regrets are minor. Dan Abnett basically pulls off the trick of making this book mediocre, where others would have failed utterly. It's a very rare breed of superior writing with inane, boring & far-off-the-mark plotting.
