Customer Reviews
Spookily brilliant - By: J. M. Salinas, 24 Jun 2008 
What a discovery!!! I bought this book as part of some research for my own book & I was very pleasantly surprised.
I never made the connection that Mr Strauss was the co-author of the much lauded Motley Crue's "The Dirt".
Ok, the storiesin this book may seem a bit stretched or hard to believe, but hey, it's Americans we are talking about. What I have to say is that reading this book made me look back on my failures & successes at picking women, & it was almost uncanny to read word by word where I went right & wrong.
The Game is a bit of a cross between Queer Eye For The Straight Guy cum Men Are From Mars Women Are From Venus cum any rock & roll tale of debauchery you care to think of.
Interesting but not recommendable for old school romantics out there.
Great - By: The Fish, 13 May 2008 
This is a great book. Whether you decide to try to use the methods demonstration within the book or not, it makes a great story with mentions of lots of celebrities & hollywood celeb hangouts.
I really enjoyed reading this book, & for the price it is well worth it.
Amazingly Fantastic, and terrible at the same time - By: Mr. R. V. F. Laruina, 22 Feb 2008 I'm so happy that I read the game. Without it, i'd still be a lonely depressed chump. However, I read itin 2005 & things have moved on, now I have to compare it to books like The Natural Art of Seduction...
The Game is a well-written engaging story. Secondly it exposes a world where men can LEARN how to be better with women. Third, it has some techniques & tricks to actually put things into practice.
The problem is that The Game describes PUA Verson 1.0, the kind where guys looked silly (peacocking), lied (routines, canned material), used silly tricks (magic?!) & basically put on a big fake act.
Just like when smokers thought it wasn't bad for them, before all the studies came out, guys loved this stuff. However, a few years later, cracks started to show:
The guys were great at the first few hours, their acting skills allowed them to get girls that really were out of their league. The problem: They could never keep these girls once the material ran out. Serious guys with interesting lives were becoming someone else when they didn't need to be. Guys were starting to become weird, to view women more & more as objects, & actually not even getting the results they wanted at the end of it.
And then came Pick Up 2.0, the kind that is about building better men, becoming a more attractive person, & over time developing "Natural Game". Sure, you might use some tricks & gimmicksin the first few weeks or months (think training wheels) but soon, all that stuff falls away as you build natural confidence.
The techniquesin The Game are not healthy for men or womenin the long run, but guys should thank Neil Strauss for bringing this little-known area into the mainstream & giving guys a way to become the person they desperately wished they were.
For a more powerful & moral appraoch, & a book with much more usable technique, check out The Natural Art of Seduction. Both books together would make a great introduction & are probably the best you can do on Amazon for imrpoving your skills with women.
Looks is deceiving - By: Leo McMarley, 19 Jan 2008 What impressed me as much as anything about Neil Strauss' lifting of the lid on the world of PUA's (pick up artists) is the quality of the writing. This is so much more than a how to manual (which it isn't really although along the way you learn a bunch of the techniques used by these guys). It's funny as hell, genuinely fascinating & above all a morality tale that is often dismissed by people who haven't read it as being some chauvinistic tract on how to use women to your own ends. It's much more complex that that even if it does paint a portrait of what it often a pretty seedy & vacuous world. Strauss knows this whilst at the same time finding it hard to resist - his reinvention himself as Style, ladies man extraordinaire & general guru to a whole bunch of desperate men, is something that he does not do without misgivings & this is what makes the book interesting & well worth a read.
