Customer Reviews
Superb book, terrible abridgement - By: P. M. Ruse, 11 Aug 2004 
I thought I'd wait until I'd finished reading this edition before writing a review, but after reading around 2/3rd's of the book I'm exasperated at just how much appears to have been omitted already. As notedin a previous review the reasons are notedin the foreword; but this can't excuse an almost savage excision of the military conflicts that occurred during this history. Indeed, entire civil wars are reduced to an editorial note before proceeding on to the next detail of internal conflict within the Church.
That's not to say I don't find such details interesting. It's just thatin attempting to address a previous imbalancein favour of military detail, this edition has swung so far the other way you are left feeling there are gaping holesin this particular history.
Excellent but too heavily abridged - By: Mr. RCS Young, 02 Aug 2004 I can heartily endorse other reviews about how well Gibbon writes & how accessible this book is despite being 1200 pages of 18th century prose.
My main gripe & the reason for the lack of stars is that this version is SO heavily abridged. I picked up this bookin the hope of learning not just political history but military history. All details of all battles that Gibbon apparently detailed so painstakingly have been removed. There are numerous other abridgments that have been made (footnotes & gorgraphic details) that I'm sure also speed up the prose but if you are looking for the definitive Gibbon you will not find it here.
I understand the reasons for it as explainedin the foreword but the detail that has been removed needs to be highlightedin Amazon's own review because this book despite it's quality as a historical political document has been a disappointment to me.
Don't doubt or delay - this is well worth buying! - By: Greg Harper, 10 May 2004 
I thought long & hard about buying these tapes before taking the plunge. I thought the 18th century prose would be tough enough to read, let alone to listen to while walking (my usual pastime while hearing audio books). And Roman history was never my favourite period. But they are just fabulous. Gibbon's prose is truly superb, & his iconoclastic view of the role of Christianity & his dry sense of humour about the key playersin this story entertains as well as informs. I can't judge if there are errors as pointed out by another reviewer but I learnt a lot & thought the abridgement was well done. So now I've no hesitationin getting Vol. II!
full description of the personalities of the roman empire - By: aibenner@aol.com, 18 Feb 2002 I originally tried to read the book, but found the vocabulary a little dated. A friend recommended the tapes, & i have'nt been disappointed with the tip.
The narrators & the choice of music add to the feeling of unfolding history & drama.
Gibbon describes the Roman Empire from start to finish, giving his own opinions on the merits & character of each emperor.He does not pander to political correctness & has some sobering thoughts on the growth of Christianity & the early Church.He also recounts the difficult relationship between the Romans & the barbarians, especially the Goths.It is the latter two mentioned above that he blames for the eventual fall of the once mighty empire.
For anyone who wishes to know about the Roman Empire & wishes to be entertained at the same time, I recommend these tapes.
Gibbon's genius is always worth listening to... - By: David Barchard, 21 Jul 2000 I have listened to this production several times. Gibbon was a great entertainer as well as a great historian & I would recommend these excerpts to anyone with a strong interestin the rise of the medieval Europe, but those who are not historians need to be aware that there are failings bothin Gibbon &in the Naxos production which spoil this recording.
First Gibbon. Leaving aside the waysin which scholarship has moved on since the eighteenth century, it has always been recognized that Gibbon's later volumes -- those that deal with the Byzantines & the period after the fall of the Empirein the westin 476 -- are much weaker than his earlier volumes. There are times when Gibbon is grossly unfair to the Byzantines; times when he exaggerates the strengths of an emperor (e.g. his words of praise for the failure emperor Manuel Comnenusin this recording); times when he is pretty silly -- e.g. suggesting that Constantine VI was poisoned by the wife of his son Romanus II orin his prurient but pointless interestin the love affairs of the wife of Belisarius; times when he strays a very long way from his main subject e.g. by writing about the Tartars & the Mongols & just seems to be writing about what takes his fancy.
Naxos has frankly done a very bad job indeed of editing these excerpts. Whoever wrote the linkage simply does not know the elementary facts of Byzantine history & so slips into some crude blunders, e.g. when the linkage text suggests that the Greek church is different from the Crusaders because it rejects the Trinity. This is simply ignorance. The same thing shows throughin the pronunciation of many names, & even less excusably some basic words. "The decent obscurity of a learned language" for example is read as "The decent obscurity of a learnt language" which is simply meaningless.
The main thrust of these volumes should be the cahnging fortunes & achievements of the eastern empire but the crucial high Byzantine centuries from 800 to 1071 are largely ignored & the impression is given that Basil II, by far the most powerful mid-Byzantine Emperor, was a little known non-entity. OK the sources for Basil II are weak but Gibbon has a good chapter on Romanus Lecapenus, another tenth century emperor, but it does not make this recording. Instead we get scandal, Mongols, & a great deal of irrelevancy. Surely Naxos could have checked their selection & their commentary with a reputable historian of the Byzantine Empire? I would urge them to try again. Gibbon deserves it & despite all these failings, I can promise that anyone who listens to these CDs will enjoy the experience. But it could easily have been so much better.
